Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-15 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note4's 77.6 general score. Galaxy A50 is a much newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note4. The Galaxy A50 features just a little better performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note4 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy A50 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a much bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.