Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-15 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, having an 83.8 score against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a a little bit lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy Note5, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy Note5 features a slightly better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A50 counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy A50 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a way more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.