Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50's overall score of 83.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is a little lighter but a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A50, and both of them were released only 0 months apart. The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy S10's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Galaxy A50's one, both have the same internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a way better (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Although Galaxy S10 is a better device, it costs more than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy S10, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.