Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is better than the Galaxy A50's 83.8 score. Galaxy S10 5G's construction is somewhat heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy A50. Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because it has a bit higher display pixel density, a little bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher video definition and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.