Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Galaxy A50, having a general score of 86.3 against 83.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10e and the Galaxy A50 were released only a couple months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is a little lighter but just a little thicker than the Galaxy A50.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number per screen inch.
The Galaxy S10e features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy A50 and Samsung Galaxy S10e feature very similar storage for games and applications, both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB and the same internal storage.
The Galaxy A50 has superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S10e, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A50, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.