Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is better than the Galaxy A50, having a score of 93.4 against 83.8. Galaxy S22 is a a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy A50, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little faster processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S22 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S22 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A50 features much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A50, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.