Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is better than Galaxy A50's 83.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably newer device than the Galaxy A50, although it is notably heavier and thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy A50 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A50. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.