Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's score of 76. The Galaxy A50 body is a bit thinner and a lot lighter than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Galaxy S24 FE counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S24 FE also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A50 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores. Galaxy A50 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy A50 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lot worse 25 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.