Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Galaxy S25, having an 83.8 score against 82.6. Galaxy A50 features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little bit better screen density.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a way better video quality.
The Galaxy S25 features a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy A50 one.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.