Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport, it's thinner and extremely newer. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A50, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy A50 has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a way bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.