Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting an 83.8 score against 78.1. Although the Galaxy A50 is older than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's construction is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy A50 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a better screen pixels density, a larger screen and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A50 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A50 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with a way better 25 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy A50 has greater battery life than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.