Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's overall score of 77.6. The Galaxy A50 design is way thinner and much lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a little bit better storage for apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A50 features a lot better performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 1% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.