Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A50's 83.8 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is newer and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A50's, although it's a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a bit bigger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in low light environments and a way worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera sensor.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A50. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A50, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.