Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy A50, with a global score of 90.6 against 83.8. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a a lot newer and thinner cellphone than Galaxy A50, although it is much heavier. The Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low-light situations and a way higher 25 MP resolution back camera. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.