Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black Shadow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50, with a overall score of 91.1 against 83.8. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition construction is way thinner but incredibly heavier than Samsung Galaxy A50. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little worse pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184px and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A50, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy A50 features a really superior processing power than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A50, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.