Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| 2019-03-15 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 score. The Galaxy A50 design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Xperia XZs. The Xperia XZs and Galaxy A50 feature similar displays, because although the Xperia XZs has a little smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit superior processing unit than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 4 more processing cores. The Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Sony Xperia XZs takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a lot worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way better battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.