Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Xperia Z4v's 78.8 general score. Galaxy A50's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Xperia Z4v. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra GPU.
Xperia Z4v features a brighter display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen. The Sony Xperia Z4v features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features better battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.