Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a general score of 83.8 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an extremely older cellphone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but it's somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch of screen. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A50, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
TCL 20 Pro 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera, a much higher video quality and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.