Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-09-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Celestial Blue, Meteorite Gray and Moonlight White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 11T Pro has an overall score of 85.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A50's 83.8 global score. Xiaomi 11T Pro is a way newer cellphone than Galaxy A50, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi 11T Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi 11T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi 11T Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi 11T Pro also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi 11T Pro, because although it has a much lower 25 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture. Xiaomi 11T Pro has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.