Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali G615-MC6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Xiaomi 14T, with an 83.8 score against 83.7. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50 is way older than Xiaomi 14T, it's body is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much faster processor than Xiaomi 14T, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi 14T counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A50, because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a slightly bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi 14T, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi 14T takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi 14T also has a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Xiaomi 14T counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.