Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, with an 83.8 score against 78.7. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50 is noticeably older than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments and a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A50 features slightly more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.