Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-10-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, with an 83.8 score against 81.2. Galaxy A50's body is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, although it was released a little bit more than a year before. Galaxy A50 features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density.
The Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a processor that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A50 one, and although the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot higher resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.