Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A50, having a overall score of 90.7 against 83.8. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a a lot newer device than the Samsung Galaxy A50, although it is noticeably heavier and a little thicker. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a little bit bigger display and a greater display density.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A50 counts with slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.