Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's general score of 81.4. Despite being the best in this review, Galaxy A50 is a just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker device than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a little bit greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy A50 has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 30% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.