Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 score. Even when the Galaxy A50 and Xiaomi Mi 9T were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy A50 is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a processing unit that's very similar to Galaxy A50's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50. Both of them have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a same size screen and the same display pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A50 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.