Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 overall score. Galaxy A50 is a somewhat thinner and lighter device than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although both were released with only 5 months difference. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50. Both of them have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, a display with the same size and the same display pixel density. The Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A50. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.