Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3, with a score of 83.8 against 79.2. Even when Galaxy A50 and Xiaomi Mi A3 were released only 4 months apart, Galaxy A50 is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. The Galaxy A50 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per display inch, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit larger screen. Xiaomi Mi A3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A50 has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi A3's battery performance is just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A50, although the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a 1 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.