Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A50's 83.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is older, a little bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A50. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s feature really similar displays, although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display, a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller display. The Galaxy A50 features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 counts with longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh. The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 25 mega-pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A50. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.