Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, having an 83.8 score against 83.8. Although the Galaxy A50 and Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 were released with only 4 months difference, the Galaxy A50 is extremely lighter and just a little bit thinner. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A50. Both of them have the same screen density, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a display with the same size. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy A50 features just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.