Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, with an 83.8 score against 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A50 features a slightly bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features improved battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.