Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2's global score of 79.3. Although Galaxy A50 is older than Xiaomi Poco X2, it's construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy A50 counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco X2's CPU is just as good as Galaxy A50's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Poco X2 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.