Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a global score of 83.8 against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older device than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it's thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger screen. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images, it also counts with a much higher resolution back camera, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A50 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.