Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's global score of 83.4. The Galaxy A50 is an extremely older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but it's much lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro both have quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a just a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a way more MP camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.