Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-03-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Laser Black, Laser Blue and POCO Yellow |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 696 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G's general score of 76.7. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is extremely older than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, it's body is lighter and just a bit thinner. Galaxy A50 features a much better performing processor than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display. The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G features a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera. The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G features improved battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.