Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's score of 78.2. Although Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's body is somewhat lighter and a lot thinner. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a quite greater pixels count per inch of screen. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much bigger sensor and a much better resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A50 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.