Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, with a score of 83.8 against 78.3. Even though Galaxy A50 is a lot older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, it's body is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a sharper display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit better display density.
Galaxy A50 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A50 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors and a lot lower 25 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.