Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 global score. Even though Galaxy A50 is a lot older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, it's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 26 percent more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.