Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a overall score of 83.8 against 78.2. The Galaxy A50 is an way older device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Galaxy A50 has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A50 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.