Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, having a score of 83.8 against 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display and a better 2080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy A50 has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.