Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has an overall score of 86.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A50's global score of 83.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Galaxy A50. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a quite larger display and a quite better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.