Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a score of 83.8 against 77.1. Galaxy A50 is a just a little thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400, a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen and a bit larger display.
Galaxy A50 has a bit more memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A50 has a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.