Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's global score of 75.7. Although Samsung Galaxy A50 is notably older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy A50 features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.