Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A50, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A50, because it has a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments, a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot better resolution camera in the back. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.