Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having a global score of 83.8 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly higher 1220 x 2710 pixels resolution and a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a larger aperture and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A50, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features superior battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.