Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 75.8. The Galaxy A50 design is newer, just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a little greater display density, a bit bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with way more MP and a much larger aperture for better low-light photos.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy A50.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.