Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a score of 83.8 against 77.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro were released with only 4 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little lighter and just a bit thinner. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A50 one. Galaxy A50 takes a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 25 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.