Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's overall score of 76.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has better battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.