Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 overall score. The Galaxy A50 is an older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but Samsung could make it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a screen that is very similar to the display in Galaxy A50, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a just a bit lower pixel number per inch in the screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A50. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor, a way better (4K) video quality and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has greater battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.