Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having an 83.8 score against 80.2. Although the Galaxy A50 and the ZTE Axon 10 Pro were released with only 2 months difference, the Galaxy A50 is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy A50, because although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit worse pixel quantity per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy A50.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.