Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having a score of 83.8 against 76.6. Galaxy A50's body is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about 11 months before. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro and Galaxy A50 feature very similar displays, because although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a quite inferior pixels quantity in each inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the battery life in Galaxy A50. The Galaxy A50 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it has a camera with much less MP, a much tinier back camera sensor which offers a lot worse image and video quality and a lot lower video resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.